STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
This text of 157 A.2d 505 (STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division, 56 N. J. Super. 589, is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in its opinion. We add that we cannot find in the record sufficient evidence of specifically identifiable property subject to escheat or custody under the statutes, N. J. S. 2A :37-13 et seq., or N. J. S. 2A :37-29 et seq.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Bubling, Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 A.2d 505, 31 N.J. 385, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-by-richman-v-sperry-hutchinson-co-nj-1960.