Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.

STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.

157 A.2d 505, 31 N.J. 385, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 238
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 25, 1960·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Pee Ctjbiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, 56 N. J. Super. 589, is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in its opinion. We add that we cannot find in the record sufficient evidence of specifically identifiable property subject to escheat or custody under the statutes, N. J. S. 2A :37-13 et seq., or N. J. S. 2A :37-29 et seq.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Bubling, Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino—7.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 157 A.2d 505, 31 N.J. 385, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 238 (N.J. 1960).

157 A.2d 505 (STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the November 8, 1996
706 A.2d 1177 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
Liptak v. Rite Aid, Inc.
673 A.2d 309 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
State v. Elsinore Shore Associates
592 A.2d 604 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)
Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co. v. McNamara
561 So. 2d 712 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1990)
North Carolina State Treasurer v. City of Asheville
300 S.E.2d 283 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)
Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. O'CONNOR
412 A.2d 539 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
O'Connor
379 A.2d 1378 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Rance v. SPERRY AND HUTCHINSON COMPANY
1965 OK 63 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1965)
Murdock v. John B. Stetson Co.
32 Pa. D. & C.2d 300 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1963)