State Board of Medical Examiners v. Noble

65 Colo. 410
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1918
DocketNo. 9138
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 65 Colo. 410 (State Board of Medical Examiners v. Noble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Board of Medical Examiners v. Noble, 65 Colo. 410 (Colo. 1918).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

This cause is before us on error to the District Court of ' the City and County of Denver to review a judgment entered on a writ of certiorari to the State Board of Medical Examiners, which judgment reversed the action of the board in revoking the license of defendant in error to practice medicine in this state.

[411]*411The board, on a hearing had upon a complaint charging defendant in error with having committed an abortion, found him guilty as charged, and revoked his license.

In the trial court it was contended that a judgment of acquittal in the Criminal Court, on the charge of having committed an abortion, was a determination of his innocence which the State Board was bound to accept, and it is so contended here. But that goes to the merits of the cause, which is not involved in this proceeding.

The Medical Board had jurisdiction of the subject and of the person, and clearly did not exceed its jurisdiction, or abuse its discretion. On a review of its action by writ of certiorari, those are the only questions to be considered: sec. 297, M. A. Code. Whether its decision on the merits is right or wrong is not within the issue. Thompson v. State Board, 59 Colo. 549, 151 Pac. 486. No complaint is made that the defendant in error did not have a fair hearing before the board; and that body’s action was within the authority granted it by law.

The judgment of the District Court is unauthorized, and is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Chief Justice Hill and Mr. Justice Bailey concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucas v. District Court
345 P.2d 1064 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1959)
City of Aurora v. Congregation Beth Medrosh Hagodol
345 P.2d 385 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1959)
Jarrett v. Cruse
185 P.2d 787 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1947)
State Ex Rel. De Gaetani v. Driskell
190 So. 461 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
State Board of Dental Examiners v. Savelle
8 P.2d 693 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1932)
Tapley v. Abbott
295 P. 911 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
State Board of Medical Examiners v. Spears
247 P. 563 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1926)
State Board of Medical Examiners v. Brown
198 P. 274 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1921)
State Board of Medical Examiners v. Boulls
69 Colo. 361 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Colo. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-board-of-medical-examiners-v-noble-colo-1918.