Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Starling v. State

Starling v. State

124 So. 3d 295, 2013 WL 5287971, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Starling v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20808 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 2013·No. No. 1D13-3157·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla.2004) (holding that, general[296]*296ly, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Starling v. State, 124 So. 3d 295, 2013 WL 5287971, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14874 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

124 So. 3d 295 (Starling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)