Starks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Starks v. State

381 S.W.3d 402, 2012 WL 4883249, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1306

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 97739·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Starks (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035.

[403]*403We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Starks (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035.

[403]*403We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Starks v. State, 381 S.W.3d 402, 2012 WL 4883249, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1306 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

381 S.W.3d 402 (Starks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.