Starks v. State
309 S.W.3d 871, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2010 WL 1854050
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Starks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 520 →
Opinion
Damon Starks (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Starks v. State, 309 S.W.3d 871, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2010 WL 1854050 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
309 S.W.3d 871 (Starks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Croghan v. Arch Coal, Inc.
309 S.W.3d 871 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)