Croghan v. Arch Coal, Inc.

309 S.W.3d 871, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 604, 2010 WL 1860007
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 2010·No. ED 94018·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Betty Croghan appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her *872 claim for unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission, based upon the whole record, could have reasonably made its findings and reached its result. Shields v. P & G Paper Prods. Co., 164 S.W.3d 540, 543 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Croghan v. Arch Coal, Inc., 309 S.W.3d 871, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 604, 2010 WL 1860007 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

309 S.W.3d 871 (Croghan v. Arch Coal, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Starks v. State
309 S.W.3d 871 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)