Starkie v. Nib Construction Corp.
This text of 235 A.D. 699 (Starkie v. Nib Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Civil Practice Act, section 120,* did not authorize the filing of a lis pendens. No claim is made in the complaint against the property of the defendant. (Ackerman v. True, 44 App. Div. 106; McManus v. Weinstein, 108 id. 301.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starkie-v-nib-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1932.