O'Connor v. Long
This text of 283 A.D. 887 (O'Connor v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to compel the removal of an alleged physical encroachment on appellants’ land, which encroachment is said to furnish lateral support to respondents’ adjoining land, and for damages, appellants filed a notice of pendency of action against respondents’ real property, under section 120 of the Civil Practice Act. Order granting respondents’ motion to cancel the notice affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Starkie V. Nib Constr. Corp., 235 App. Div. 699, and cases cited therein.) Nolan, P.J., Adel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 887, 129 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-long-nyappdiv-1954.