O'Connor v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Connor v. Long

283 A.D. 887, 129 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5649

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 1954·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to compel the removal of an alleged physical encroachment on appellants’ land, which encroachment is said to furnish lateral support to respondents’ adjoining land, and for damages, appellants filed a notice of pendency of action against respondents’ real property, under section 120 of the Civil Practice Act. Order granting respondents’ motion to cancel the notice affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Starkie V. Nib Constr. Corp., 235 App. Div. 699, and cases cited therein.) Nolan, P.J., Adel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to compel the removal of an alleged physical encroachment on appellants’ land, which encroachment is said to furnish lateral support to respondents’ adjoining land, and for damages, appellants filed a notice of pendency of action against respondents’ real property, under section 120 of the Civil Practice Act. Order granting respondents’ motion to cancel the notice affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Starkie V. Nib Constr. Corp., 235 App. Div. 699, and cases cited therein.) Nolan, P.J., Adel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

O'Connor v. Long, 283 A.D. 887, 129 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

283 A.D. 887 (O'Connor v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related