Starbucks Corporation v. Jeanette Kunitz
This text of Starbucks Corporation v. Jeanette Kunitz (Starbucks Corporation v. Jeanette Kunitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 29, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21A0013. STARBUCKS CORPORATION v. KUNITZ.
We granted Starbucks Corporation’s application for discretionary review of the trial court’s denial of Starbucks’s motion under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (3) to set aside a default judgment and award of damages to Jeanette Kunitz. After careful review of the entire record in this case, we conclude that the application for discretionary review was improvidently granted, and it is ordered that this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/29/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Starbucks Corporation v. Jeanette Kunitz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starbucks-corporation-v-jeanette-kunitz-gactapp-2021.