Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Stanley v. Ramsay

Stanley v. Ramsay

271 So. 3d 157
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2019·No. No. 3D19-166; No. 3D19-167; No. 3D19-168; No. 3D19-170; No. 3D19-171; No. 3D19-204; No. 3D19-205; No. 3D19-206; No. 3D19-207; No. 3D19-208; No. 3D19-209; No. 3D19-210; No. 3D19-211; No. 3D19-212; No. 3D19-213; No. 3D19-214; No. 3D19-215; No. 3D19-217; No. 3D19-218; No. 3D19-219; No. 3D19-220; No. 3D19-221; No. 3D19-222; No. 3D19-223; No. 3D19-232·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*159Following the issuance of this Court's Order to Show Cause requiring the appellant, Skip Stuart Stanley, to show good cause why these cases should not be dismissed as frivolous and an abuse of process, the appellant has not made such a showing. As such, these appeals are dismissed.

Additionally, we hold that the appellant has repeatedly abused the judicial system with his frequent, frivolous filings. Accordingly, the appellant is hereby barred from filing any additional pro se filings in any case before this Court. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any future filings from the appellant unless they are reviewed and signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.

Consolidated cases dismissed; appellant barred from future pro se filings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley v. Ramsay, 271 So. 3d 157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

271 So. 3d 157 (Stanley v. Ramsay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.