Stanley v. Ramsay

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2019
Docket19-0166 & 19-0167 & 19-0168 & 19-0170 & 19-0171 & 19-0204 & 19-0205 & 19-0206 & 19-0207 & 19-0208 & 19-0209 & 19-0210 & 19-0211 & 19-0212 & 19-0213 & 19-0214 & 19-0215 & 19-0217 & 19-0218 & 19-0219 & 19-0220 & 19-0221 & 19-0222 & 19-0223 & 19-0232
StatusPublished

This text of Stanley v. Ramsay (Stanley v. Ramsay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanley v. Ramsay, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

________________

No. 3D19-166 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1365-K ________________

Skip Stuart Stanley, Appellant,

vs.

Sheriff Rick Ramsay, Appellee.

No. 3D19-167 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1366-K ________________

Sheriff Don Catala, Appellee.

________________ No. 3D19-168 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1367-K ________________

Deputy Sheriff Aaron Roddy, Appellee.

No. 3D19-170 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1467-K ________________

No. 3D19-171 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1468-K ________________

2 vs.

No. 3D19-204 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1312-K ________________

George Braff, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D19-205 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1313-K ________________

No. 3D19-206 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1315-K

3 ________________

No. 3D19-207 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1363-K ________________

No. 3D19-208 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1417-K ________________

George Braff, et al.,

4 Appellees.

No. 3D19-209 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1466-K ________________

George Braff, Appellee.

No. 3D19-210 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1418-K ________________

Eric Moore, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-211 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1394-K ________________

5 Skip Stuart Stanley, Appellant,

No. 3D19-212 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1454-K ________________

Cara Higgins, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-213 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1449-K ________________

Chief Judge Mark H. Jones, etc., Appellee.

6 No. 3D19-214 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1450-K ________________

No. 3D19-215 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1452-K ________________

Hon. Jorge Labarga, Appellee.

No. 3D19-217 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1453-K ________________

7 vs.

Judge Peary Fowler, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-218 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1411-K ________________

Brian Yablonski, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-219 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1412-K ________________

Bo Rivard, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-220 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1413-K

8 ________________

FWC Captain David Dupree, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-221 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1414-K ________________

FWC Sgt. Steve Dion, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-222 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1316-K ________________

Cynthia McPherson, etc.,

9 Appellee.

No. 3D19-223 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1364-K ________________

Cynthia McPherson, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-232 Lower Tribunal No. 18-1451-K ________________

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark Wilson, Timothy J. Koenig and Bonnie J. Helms, Judges.

Skip Stuart Stanley, in proper person.

10 Purdy, Jolly, Giuffreda, Barranco & Jisa, P.A., and Gregory J. Jolly (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees Sheriff Rick Ramsay, Don Catala and Aaron Roddy; Cynthia L. Hall and Paunece R. Scull, Assistant County Attorneys, for appellee Cynthia McPherson.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Appellant, Skip Stuart Stanley, filed the captioned 25 cases in this Court

between January 30 and February 5, 2019, regarding unsuccessful filings in the

Monroe County Circuit Court. The notices of appeal, motions, appendices, and other

filings collectively state no legally cognizable cause of action and no discernible

legal basis for a claim of error in any Circuit Court ruling. These 2019 filings follow

a series of unsuccessful and similar filings in this Court in 2017.

Upon its own motion, the Court now consolidates these twenty-five cases

under Case No. 3D19-166, Stanley v. Sheriff Rick Ramsay, and orders the appellant

to show good cause in writing, within 20 days from the date of this Order, why these

cases should not be dismissed as frivolous and an abuse of process. See Ardis v.

Ardis, 130 So. 3d 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. The appellant’s

response shall also show good cause in writing, within the same filing and 20-day

period, why he should not be barred from proceeding pro se in any case before this

11 court, with direction to the Clerk of this Court not to accept any future filings from

him unless they are signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ardis v. Ardis
130 So. 3d 791 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stanley v. Ramsay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-ramsay-fladistctapp-2019.