Stanley v. Dennison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stanley v. Dennison

20 A.D.3d 790, 797 N.Y.S.2d 924, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7949

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 21, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.D.3d 790 (Stanley v. Dennison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stanley v. Dennison, 20 A.D.3d 790, 797 N.Y.S.2d 924, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Benza, J.), entered November 1, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Farole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the May 20, 2003 determination giving rise to this CFLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in May 2005, the instant matter must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Baez v Travis, 10 AD3d 778 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 702 [2004]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Benza, J.), entered November 1, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Farole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the May 20, 2003 determination giving rise to this CFLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in May 2005, the instant matter must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Baez v Travis, 10 AD3d 778 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 702 [2004]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.3d 790, 797 N.Y.S.2d 924, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-v-dennison-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack