Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Baez v. Travis

Baez v. Travis

10 A.D.3d 778, 781 N.Y.S.2d 759, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10965
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 10 A.D.3d 778 (Baez v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baez v. Travis, 10 A.D.3d 778, 781 N.Y.S.2d 759, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cannizzaro, J.), entered September 15, 2003 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the May 2002 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in June 2004, the instant matter must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Karo v Travis, 4 AD3d 589 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raheem v. Dennison
25 A.D.3d 1062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Rivera v. New York State Division of Parole
23 A.D.3d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Wilson v. Dennison
22 A.D.3d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Graziano v. Travis
21 A.D.3d 1174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Stanley v. Dennison
20 A.D.3d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Borcsok v. Travis
18 A.D.3d 1062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Lataj v. Travis
18 A.D.3d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Kalonji v. Travis
18 A.D.3d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Culpepper v. New York State Board of Parole
17 A.D.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Alston v. New York State Board of Parole
16 A.D.3d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Richburg v. New York State Division of Parole
14 A.D.3d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Tapia v. New York State Board of Parole
14 A.D.3d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 A.D.3d 778, 781 N.Y.S.2d 759, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baez-v-travis-nyappdiv-2004.