Stanley McDonald Norman R. Hagfors, and Clayton Jensen, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Johnson & Johnson, Appellee/cross-Appellant

722 F.2d 1390
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1983·No. 82-2152·Published

Opinion

722 F.2d 1390

Stanley McDONALD, Norman R. Hagfors, and Clayton Jensen,
Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
v.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 82-2152, 82-2171.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 16, 1983.

Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York City, Maslon, Edelman, Borman & Brand, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee/cross-appellant Johnson & Johnson; David F. Dobbins, Theodore B. Van Itallie, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Daniel R. Shulman, Minneapolis, Minn., Joseph M. Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants/cross-appellees (McDonald); Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, Minneapolis, Minn., Alioto & Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., of counsel.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In light of this court's opinion in McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson, 722 F.2d 1370 (1983) vacating the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the antitrust claims, the district court's order, 546 F.Supp. 324 (D.Minn.1982), awarding attorney's fees totaling $2,213,874.43 pursuant to section 4 of the Clayton Act is vacated. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley McDonald Norman R. Hagfors, and Clayton Jensen, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Johnson & Johnson, Appellee/cross-Appellant, 722 F.2d 1390 (8th Cir. 1983).

722 F.2d 1390 (Stanley McDonald Norman R. Hagfors, and Clayton Jensen, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Johnson & Johnson, Appellee/cross-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson
546 F. Supp. 324 (D. Minnesota, 1982)