Stanley Ex Rel. Stanley v. Town of Smithfield
This text of 190 S.E. 207 (Stanley Ex Rel. Stanley v. Town of Smithfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question involved: “Does the complaint state a cause of action wherein it is alleged that a minor boy eleven years old suffered serious bodily injury from an electric current coursing through' bis body, while at play, on a main well-traveled public highway, when be accidentally threw a small wire attached to an improvised spool across the uninsulated electric wires of the defendant whereon 2300 volts of electricity were being transmitted and approximately twenty-three feet above the surface of tbe giound?” We think not.
*387 The plaintiff cites many decisions in this State sustaining liability, but none go so far as the facts in the present cause. We think the court below correct in sustaining the demurrer of defendant. Parker v. R. R., 169 N. C., 68.
The judgment of the court below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 S.E. 207, 211 N.C. 386, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanley-ex-rel-stanley-v-town-of-smithfield-nc-1937.