Deese v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
This text of 67 S.E.2d 751 (Deese v. Carolina Power & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe evidence disclosed no actionable negligence on the part of defendant. The death of plaintiff’s intestate evidently resulted from his own independent acts in felling the tree across defendant’s tap line and thereafter attempting to cut the tree top or bough in order to release the wire. This is a situation which, under the circumstances here presented, could not have been reasonably foreseen by the defendant. Parker v. R. R., 169 N.C. 68, 85 S.E. 33; Stanley v. Smithfield, 211 N.C. 386, 190 S.E. 207.
The judgment of nonsuit is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 S.E.2d 751, 234 N.C. 558, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deese-v-carolina-power-light-co-nc-1951.