Stanford v. Linen
This text of 261 A.D. 877 (Stanford v. Linen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The Special Term was vested with discretion to deny [878]*878plaintiff’s application for leave to discontinue his action on payment of costs. (See Carleton v. Darcy, 75 N. Y. 375; Matter of Lasak, 131 id. 624.) All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to discontinue the action upon payment of taxable costs to date.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [171 Misc. 1001.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 877, 25 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanford-v-linen-nyappdiv-1941.