Stanford v. Linen
261 A.D. 877, 25 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7865
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 8, 1941·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The Special Term was vested with discretion to deny [878]*878plaintiff’s application for leave to discontinue his action on payment of costs. (See Carleton v. Darcy, 75 N. Y. 375; Matter of Lasak, 131 id. 624.) All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to discontinue the action upon payment of taxable costs to date.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [171 Misc. 1001.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stanford v. Linen, 261 A.D. 877, 25 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
261 A.D. 877 (Stanford v. Linen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bonfante v. Hadar Homes, Inc.
84 A.D.2d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Cooper v. Cooper
103 Misc. 2d 689 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Schultz v. Kobus
15 A.D.2d 382 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Weisinger v. Berfond
21 Misc. 2d 788 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Van Aalten v. Mack
17 Misc. 2d 828 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)