Bonfante v. Hadar Homes, Inc.

84 A.D.2d 570, 443 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15655
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 26, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 84 A.D.2d 570 (Bonfante v. Hadar Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bonfante v. Hadar Homes, Inc., 84 A.D.2d 570, 443 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Hadar Homes, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated October 23, 1980, which, upon certain conditions, granted plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3217 (subd [b]) to voluntarily discontinue the action. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. On a prior appeal in this action (Bonfante v Hadar Homes, 74 AD2d 887), this court reversed an order granting plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint and bill of particulars. This ruling constitutes a substantial right which has accrued to defendant Hadar and should not now be abrogated by allowing plaintiffs to discontinue the action. Moreover, allowing a discontinuance would be tantamount to allowing plaintiffs to disregard the law of the case as established on the earlier appeal (see Standford v Cayuga Linen & Cotton Mills, 171 Misc 1001, 1003, affd 261 App Div 877), and, at this juncture, would be prejudicial to the defendant Hadar (see Bonfante v Hadar Homes, 74 AD2d 887, supra). Accordingly, Special Term’s granting of the motion constituted an abuse of discretion. Gulotta, J.P., Margett, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montalto v. Colgate Scaffolding Corp.
128 A.D.3d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Massey v. She Shang Jung
267 A.D.2d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Brenhouse v. Anthony Industries, Inc.
156 A.D.2d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
St. Pierre v. Ostreich
123 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 A.D.2d 570, 443 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonfante-v-hadar-homes-inc-nyappdiv-1981.