Stanfield v. Forrest Five to Five Dollar Stores

99 S.E.2d 167, 95 Ga. App. 739, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 903
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 1, 1957
Docket36669, 36670
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 99 S.E.2d 167 (Stanfield v. Forrest Five to Five Dollar Stores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanfield v. Forrest Five to Five Dollar Stores, 99 S.E.2d 167, 95 Ga. App. 739, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 903 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

Felton, C. J.

This is not a clear and indisputable case that can be resolved as a matter of law. The object which caused the plaintiff to fall was not so bulky or so generally expected to be in the place where she was injured. The plaintiff alleged that the object was concealed because of poor lighting and that her attention was partially diverted by the wares displayed on the counter. The law is well settled that under such circumstances, the case is one for a jury’s determination. Harris v. Mayes, 94 Ga. App. 505 (2) (95 S. E. 2d 26); Miller v. Bart, 90 Ga. App. 755 (84 S. E. 2d 127); Glover v. City Council of Augusta, 83 Ga. App. 314 (63 S. E. 2d 422); Mason v. Frankel, 49 Ga. App. 145 (2) (174 S. E. 546); King Hardware Co. v. Teplis, 91 Ga. App. 13 (84 S. E. 2d 686); Atlanta Enterprises, Inc. v. Douglass, 93 Ga. App. 237 (91 S. E. 2d 296).

The court erred in sustaining the general demurrers and in dismissing the actions.

Judgments reversed.

Quillian and Nichols, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Farmers' Market Authority v. Dabbs
256 S.E.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Burger Barn, Inc. v. Young
207 S.E.2d 234 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Kroger Company v. Anderson
140 S.E.2d 108 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
COLONIAL STORES, INC. v. Owens
130 S.E.2d 616 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.
124 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
King v. Davison-Paxon Co.
123 S.E.2d 269 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Big Apple Super Market of Rome, Inc. v. Briggs
115 S.E.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Rich's, Inc. v. Denmon
114 S.E.2d 462 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E.2d 167, 95 Ga. App. 739, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanfield-v-forrest-five-to-five-dollar-stores-gactapp-1957.