Harris v. Mayes

95 S.E.2d 26, 94 Ga. App. 505, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 593
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 23, 1956
Docket36404
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 S.E.2d 26 (Harris v. Mayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Mayes, 95 S.E.2d 26, 94 Ga. App. 505, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 593 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Qtjillian, J.

1. The filing of an amendment which has no prayer that it be made a part of the petition does not of itself make such amendment a part of the record, but where the amendment was tendered and an order passed directing that it be filed subject to the right of the defendant to demur, the defendant did renew his demurrers, and the judge overruled the demurrers to the petition as amended, the amendment will be treated as having been formally allowed. Newill v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 48 Ga. App. 226 (172 S. E. 232).

2. Under the holdings in Mason v. Frankel, 49 Ga. App. 145 (2) (174 S. E. 546), and King Hdw. Co. v. Teplis, 91 Ga. App. 13 (84 S. E. 2d 686), the general demurrer was properly overruled by the judge of the superior court.

3. The special demurrers are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stanfield v. Forrest Five to Five Dollar Stores
99 S.E.2d 167 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E.2d 26, 94 Ga. App. 505, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-mayes-gactapp-1956.