Harris v. Mayes

95 S.E.2d 26, 94 Ga. App. 505, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 593
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 23, 1956·No. 36404·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Qtjillian, J.

1. The filing of an amendment which has no prayer that it be made a part of the petition does not of itself make such amendment a part of the record, but where the amendment was tendered and an order passed directing that it be filed subject to the right of the defendant to demur, the defendant did renew his demurrers, and the judge overruled the demurrers to the petition as amended, the amendment will be treated as having been formally allowed. Newill v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 48 Ga. App. 226 (172 S. E. 232).

2. Under the holdings in Mason v. Frankel, 49 Ga. App. 145 (2) (174 S. E. 546), and King Hdw. Co. v. Teplis, 91 Ga. App. 13 (84 S. E. 2d 686), the general demurrer was properly overruled by the judge of the superior court.

3. The special demurrers are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Mayes, 95 S.E.2d 26, 94 Ga. App. 505, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 593 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

95 S.E.2d 26 (Harris v. Mayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stanfield v. Forrest Five to Five Dollar Stores
99 S.E.2d 167 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)