Standridge v. Priest

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Standridge v. Priest

975 S.W.2d 439, 334 Ark. 428, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 520

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 1, 1998

Docket98-1115

StatusPublished

This text of 975 S.W.2d 439 (Standridge v. Priest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Standridge v. Priest, 975 S.W.2d 439, 334 Ark. 428, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 520 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Brent Standridge, has moved for expedited consideration of his appeal from a circuit court order denying his,petition for writ of mandamus and declaratory judgment, seeking that the appellee, Sharon Priest, Secretary of State, be directed to place Standridge’s name on the ballots for the 1998 elections as a candidate for one of the Arkansas Court of Appeals’ judicial positions created by Act 15 of 1995 (1st Ex. Sess.). Additionally, Standridge has filed a motion to supplement the record. The appellee has not filed a response to either motion. We grant the motion for expedited consideration of this appeal, and we grant appellant’s motion to supplement the record. The appellant filed his brief on September 17, 1998. The appellee’s brief shall be filed by Monday, October 5, 1998. The appellant’s reply brief shall be filed by Wednesday, October 7, 1998.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Brent Standridge, has moved for expedited consideration of his appeal from a circuit court order denying his,petition for writ of mandamus and declaratory judgment, seeking that the appellee, Sharon Priest, Secretary of State, be directed to place Standridge’s name on the ballots for the 1998 elections as a candidate for one of the Arkansas Court of Appeals’ judicial positions created by Act 15 of 1995 (1st Ex. Sess.). Additionally, Standridge has filed a motion to supplement the record. The appellee has not filed a response to either motion. We grant the motion for expedited consideration of this appeal, and we grant appellant’s motion to supplement the record. The appellant filed his brief on September 17, 1998. The appellee’s brief shall be filed by Monday, October 5, 1998. The appellant’s reply brief shall be filed by Wednesday, October 7, 1998.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

975 S.W.2d 439, 334 Ark. 428, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standridge-v-priest-ark-1998.