Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United States
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gitkin Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
61 Cust. Ct. 666 (Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.