Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1016, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1945
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 12, 1968
DocketNo. P68/136; protests 63/7100, etc. (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1016 (Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1016, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1945 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gritkin Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gitkin Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 383 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)
B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 460 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 1016, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/standard-brands-paint-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.