Stamler v. Willis

Supreme Court

Stamler v. Willis

393 U.S. 217

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 13, 1969

Docket478

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 393 U.S. 217 (Stamler v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 217 (1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits and that the cases should be set for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits and that the cases should be set for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 U.S. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stamler-v-willis-scotus-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack