Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.

397 U.S. 820, 90 S. Ct. 1517, 25 L. Ed. 2d 806, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1913
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 4, 1970·No. 1379·Published·Cited by 39 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U. S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U. S. 407.

Mr. Justice Douglas concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc., 397 U.S. 820, 90 S. Ct. 1517, 25 L. Ed. 2d 806, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1913 (1970).

397 U.S. 820 (Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abbott v. Perez
585 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 2018)
Hays v. State of La.
Fifth Circuit, 1994
Illinois Council for Long Term Care v. Miller
503 F. Supp. 1091 (N.D. Illinois, 1980)
Hempstead General Hospital v. Whalen
474 F. Supp. 398 (E.D. New York, 1979)
Socialist Workers Party v. March Fong Eu
591 F.2d 1252 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
Alabama Nursing Home Ass'n v. Califano
433 F. Supp. 1325 (M.D. Alabama, 1977)
Wilson v. Edelman
542 F.2d 1260 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)
Massachusetts General Hospital v. Sargent
397 F. Supp. 1056 (D. Massachusetts, 1975)
Mon Chi Heung Au v. Lum
512 F.2d 430 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union
419 U.S. 90 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Gerstein v. Coe
417 U.S. 279 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County
415 U.S. 250 (Supreme Court, 1974)