Stalis v. Sugar Creek Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stalis v. Sugar Creek Stores, Inc.

295 A.D.2d 942, 743 N.Y.S.2d 918, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6321

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2002

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 942 (Stalis v. Sugar Creek Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stalis v. Sugar Creek Stores, Inc., 295 A.D.2d 942, 743 N.Y.S.2d 918, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal and cross appeal from parts of an order of Supreme Court, Steuben County (Bradstreet, J.), entered December 18, 2001, that, inter alia, granted in part plaintiffs’ and defendant’s motions to reargue.

It is hereby ordered that the appeal and cross appeal from the order insofar as it denied reargument be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984) and the order is modified on the law by vacating the second and third ordering paragraphs and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Stalis v Sugar Cr. Stores ([appeal No. 1] 295 AD2d 939). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal and cross appeal from parts of an order of Supreme Court, Steuben County (Bradstreet, J.), entered December 18, 2001, that, inter alia, granted in part plaintiffs’ and defendant’s motions to reargue.

It is hereby ordered that the appeal and cross appeal from the order insofar as it denied reargument be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984) and the order is modified on the law by vacating the second and third ordering paragraphs and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Stalis v Sugar Cr. Stores ([appeal No. 1] 295 AD2d 939). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 942, 743 N.Y.S.2d 918, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stalis-v-sugar-creek-stores-inc-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack