Stais v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.

106 A.2d 216, 378 Pa. 289, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 594
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 28, 1954
DocketAppeals, 38 and 39
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 106 A.2d 216 (Stais v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stais v. Sears-Roebuck & Co., 106 A.2d 216, 378 Pa. 289, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 594 (Pa. 1954).

Opinions

Opinion

Per Curiam,

These appeals, here by special allowance, are from an order of the Superior Court affirming respective judgments for the husband and wife plaintiffs for damages occasioned each as a result of personal injuries suffered by the wife in a fall down a flight of stairs negligently maintained by the defendant company in one of its stores. Nothing more is involved than the private interests of the immediate parties to the litigation; and the relevant rule of law, which the Superior Court correctly applied in its unanimous opinion (see 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 498), is extremely simple and not open to question. The case is not, therefore, one of general importance or necessary to secure uniformity of decision: see Taylor v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company, 245 Pa. 189, 196, 91 A. 631; also Kraemer v. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co., 173 Pa. 416, 418, 33 A. 1047. Accordingly, the decision of the Superior Court appropriately ended the matter.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Austin, M. v. Woodward Properties, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
Blakely v. St. Marguerite's Mutual Beneficial Society
10 Pa. D. & C.5th 248 (Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, 2009)
Gosha v. City of Philadelphia
30 Pa. D. & C.3d 190 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1982)
Williams v. Bashman
457 F. Supp. 322 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
Ratay v. Liu
260 A.2d 484 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Commonwealth v. Sliva
204 A.2d 455 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
Adams v. J. C. Penney Co.
192 A.2d 218 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Georgia Saddler v. Bethel Markets, Inc
267 F.2d 805 (Third Circuit, 1959)
Beitch v. Mishkin
132 A.2d 703 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Hess v. Sun Ray Drug Co.
127 A.2d 699 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Katz v. John Wanamaker Philadelphia, Inc.
112 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Stais v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.
106 A.2d 216 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A.2d 216, 378 Pa. 289, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stais-v-sears-roebuck-co-pa-1954.