Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
This text of 174 So. 2d 540 (Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Third District, because of alleged conflicts with prior decisions of this Court and other District Courts. Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, 163 So.2d 15.
We have thoroughly examined the record and briefs, and have heard oral arguments. This careful consideration of the matter has led us to conclude that the petitioner has failed to demonstrate any conflict of deci[541]*541sions sufficient to activate the jurisdiction, of this Court.
The writ was improvidently issued, so it is therefore discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 So. 2d 540, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stager-v-florida-east-coast-railway-co-fla-1965.