Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

174 So. 2d 540, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3139
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 28, 1965·No. No. 33556·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Third District, because of alleged conflicts with prior decisions of this Court and other District Courts. Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, 163 So.2d 15.

We have thoroughly examined the record and briefs, and have heard oral arguments. This careful consideration of the matter has led us to conclude that the petitioner has failed to demonstrate any conflict of deci[541]*541sions sufficient to activate the jurisdiction, of this Court.

The writ was improvidently issued, so it is therefore discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Co., 174 So. 2d 540, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3139 (Fla. 1965).

174 So. 2d 540 (Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Utianski v. Ewing
545 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Estate of Castano
544 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi
502 So. 2d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Fogel v. Mirmelli
413 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cason v. Smith
365 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
189 So. 2d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)