Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi
This text of 502 So. 2d 973 (Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prior to trial, the court entered an order limiting witnesses, stating:
The parties are limited to one expert per discipline.... If there are separate board certifications for ... two areas of expertise then one expert will be allowed in each.
We reject appellants’ contention that the trial court applied the order in a discriminatory fashion and improperly excluded one of their expert witnesses. A review of the record discloses that the court merely implemented its order. See Ritter v. Jimenez, 343 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Stager v. Florida East Coast Ry., 163 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. discharged, 174 So.2d 540 (Fla.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878, 86 S.Ct. 162, 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965). Appellants’ remaining points lack merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
502 So. 2d 973, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 478, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maler-ex-rel-maler-v-geraldi-fladistctapp-1987.