Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi

502 So. 2d 973, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 478, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1987·No. No. 85-2865·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Prior to trial, the court entered an order limiting witnesses, stating:

The parties are limited to one expert per discipline.... If there are separate board certifications for ... two areas of expertise then one expert will be allowed in each.

We reject appellants’ contention that the trial court applied the order in a discriminatory fashion and improperly excluded one of their expert witnesses. A review of the record discloses that the court merely implemented its order. See Ritter v. Jimenez, 343 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Stager v. Florida East Coast Ry., 163 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. discharged, 174 So.2d 540 (Fla.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878, 86 S.Ct. 162, 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965). Appellants’ remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi, 502 So. 2d 973, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 478, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

502 So. 2d 973 (Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vargas, M.D. v. Gutierrez
176 So. 3d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Lion Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Suarez
844 So. 2d 768 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Gold, Vann & White, PA v. DeBERRY EX REL. DeBERRY
639 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Maler ex rel. Maler v. Barad
541 So. 2d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)