Stafford v. State ex rel. Rhine
Opinion
Action by the commissioner to collect drainage assessments.
An answer was properly held bad on demurrer, wherein it was averred that, by the terms of the contract, nothing was to be paid to the contractor until the ditch was completed according to the plans and specifications; that a large portion of the work had been done with the com[541]*541missioner’s consent, in a manner widely divergent from the plans and specifications, and that the contractor did not intend to, and would not, complete the same in accordance with the terms of his contract.
The remedy for such derelictions of duty upon the part of the commissioner and contractor is to be obtained by proceeding directly against them in the circuit court. Indianapolis, etc., Gravel Road Co. v. State, ex rel., 105 Ind. 37; Racer v. State, for Use, 131 Ind. 393; Racer v. Wingate, 138 Ind. 114; Wilson v. State, ex rel., 9 Ind. App. 696.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
40 N.E. 701 (Stafford v. State ex rel. Rhine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.