Stacey v. State

165 So. 2d 222, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 10, 1964
DocketNo. 4553
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 165 So. 2d 222 (Stacey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stacey v. State, 165 So. 2d 222, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court denying a motion for post conviction relief. The motion was deficient in failing to allege the insolvency of the appellant.

The order appealed is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant to file a motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix alleging facts, if he can, showing his entitlement to relief.

Affirmed.

WHITE, Acting C. J., and ANDREWS and KANNER, (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riley v. State
195 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Leeds v. State
187 So. 2d 77 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Roberts v. State
169 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 So. 2d 222, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stacey-v-state-fladistctapp-1964.