Stacey v. State

165 So. 2d 222, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 1964·No. No. 4553·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court denying a motion for post conviction relief. The motion was deficient in failing to allege the insolvency of the appellant.

The order appealed is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant to file a motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix alleging facts, if he can, showing his entitlement to relief.

Affirmed.

WHITE, Acting C. J., and ANDREWS and KANNER, (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacey v. State, 165 So. 2d 222, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

165 So. 2d 222 (Stacey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riley v. State
195 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Leeds v. State
187 So. 2d 77 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Roberts v. State
169 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)