Riley v. State
195 So. 2d 635, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5380
This text of 195 So. 2d 635 (Riley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riley v. State, 195 So. 2d 635, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5380 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
Opinion
Affirmed under the authority of Hinton v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 522; Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Stacey v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 222; and Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Savage v. State
156 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Dias v. State
158 So. 2d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Stacey v. State
165 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Hinton v. State
177 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
195 So. 2d 635, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.