Riley v. State
195 So. 2d 635, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5380
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Riley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045 →
Opinion
Affirmed under the authority of Hinton v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 522; Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Stacey v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 222; and Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riley v. State, 195 So. 2d 635, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5380 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
195 So. 2d 635 (Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Savage v. State
156 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Dias v. State
158 So. 2d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Stacey v. State
165 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Hinton v. State
177 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)