St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Jackson
This text of 95 S.E. 717 (St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only 'assignment of error is that the judge erred in awarding a nonsuit. A. consideration of the evidence being necessary to a determination of the issue, involved, and no proper brief thereof being made, the judgment must be affirmed. Tidwell v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co., 20 Ga. App. 826 (93 S. E. 511), and cases cited; Ryan v. Kingsbery, 88 Ga. 361 (2), 368 (14 S. E. 596); Moss v. Birch, 102 Ga. 556 (28 S. E. 601); Henson v. Derrick, 104 Ga. 856 (31 S. E. 199); Wall v. Mercer, 119 Ga. 346 (1), 349 (46 S. E. 420), and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 S.E. 717, 22 Ga. App. 200, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-v-jackson-gactapp-1918.