Moss v. Birch

Supreme Court of Georgia

Moss v. Birch

28 S.E. 623, 102 Ga. 556, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 562

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 19, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 28 S.E. 623 (Moss v. Birch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moss v. Birch, 28 S.E. 623, 102 Ga. 556, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 562 (Ga. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Little, J.

Where in a bill of exceptions the only error assigned is that the presiding judge refused to grant aii injunction, and the evidence upon which such refusal was had, being documentary, is set out in full in the bill of exceptions, without any attempt whatever to brief the same having been made as required by the act approved November 11, 1889, but including immaterial and unnecessary portions of many of the documents, according to repeatedrulingsof this court the evidence so incorporated in the bill [557]*557of exceptions will not be considered; and there being no question for decision which arises on the pleadings in the case, the judgment below is

Submitted April 20, Decided May 19, 1897. II. B. Moss, for plaintiff. II. N. Holland, for defendants.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little, J.

Where in a bill of exceptions the only error assigned is that the presiding judge refused to grant aii injunction, and the evidence upon which such refusal was had, being documentary, is set out in full in the bill of exceptions, without any attempt whatever to brief the same having been made as required by the act approved November 11, 1889, but including immaterial and unnecessary portions of many of the documents, according to repeatedrulingsof this court the evidence so incorporated in the bill [557]*557of exceptions will not be considered; and there being no question for decision which arises on the pleadings in the case, the judgment below is

Submitted April 20, Decided May 19, 1897. II. B. Moss, for plaintiff. II. N. Holland, for defendants.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 S.E. 623, 102 Ga. 556, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-v-birch-ga-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack