St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute R. R. v. Bell

81 Ill. 76
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 81 Ill. 76 (St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute R. R. v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute R. R. v. Bell, 81 Ill. 76 (Ill. 1876).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dickey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Robert Bell, a lad some nine years old, in company with other lads, wandered on a pleasant Sunday into the suburbs of the village of Highland, and there found other and larger boys, and embarked in the sport of turning and riding round upon a turn-table of the appellant, and, while so engaged, Robert Bell was seriously hurt.

This was an action brought to recover damages for that injury, upon the ground of negligence, or want of proper care on the part of the railroad company.

The structure was a skeleton turn-tahle, not covered with plank, and not protected by a wall except where the rails of the switch intersected it. The turn-table was not near any public street, nor in the place where the public were in the habit of passing. It was fastened with a latch, which prevented it from being turned by accident, but it was not locked, so as to render it impracticable for boys to open or withdraw the latch and move the table

The testimony is voluminous, and in some respects discordant, but there is no ground for serious dispute about the main facts. A verdict was rendered for plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was refused, and defendant excepted.

After a careful examination of the testimony, this court is of opinion that, in view of the isolated position in which the turn-table was located, the proofs fail to show that appellant was guilty of such want of care as could lawfully charge it with damages for this accident.

The judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolczek v. Public Service Co.
174 N.E. 577 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1930)
Gritton v. Illinois Traction, Inc.
247 Ill. App. 395 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
Hayko v. Colorado & Utah Coal Co.
235 P. 373 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1925)
Caillier v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.
120 So. 76 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1921)
Anderson v. Karstens
218 Ill. App. 285 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1920)
Taylor v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad
180 Iowa 702 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)
Prickett v. Pardridge
189 Ill. App. 307 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)
City of Shawnee v. Cheek
1913 OK 739 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Capp v. City of St. Louis
158 S.W. 616 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1913)
Rost v. Parker Washington Co.
176 Ill. App. 245 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1913)
McDermott v. Burke
100 N.E. 168 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1912)
Railroad v. Harvey
77 Ohio St. (N.S.) 235 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1907)
Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Klinkrath
130 Ill. App. 322 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
Belt Railway Co. v. Charters
123 Ill. App. 322 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)
Perez v. American Railroad
9 P.R. 196 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1905)
Pérez v. American Railroad Co.
9 P.R. Dec. 218 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1905)
York v. Pacific & Northern Railway Co.
69 P. 1042 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1902)
Ryan v. Towar
55 L.R.A. 310 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Beavers
39 S.E. 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 Ill. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-vandalia-terre-haute-r-r-v-bell-ill-1876.