St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. Smith
243 U.S. 630, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1591
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 354; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Renn, 241 U. S. 290, 293.
See St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Ry. Co. v. Seale, 229 U. S. 156.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. Smith, 243 U.S. 630, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1591 (1917).
243 U.S. 630 (St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co.
216 N.E.2d 900 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1966)
Stolz v. New York Central Railroad
164 N.E.2d 849 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
Ross v. Robinson
147 P.2d 204 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co.
121 F.2d 561 (Eighth Circuit, 1941)
Kennard v. Ill. Cent. R. Co.
148 S.W.2d 1017 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1941)
McAllister v. Sloan
81 F.2d 707 (Eighth Circuit, 1936)
Keith v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
132 So. 223 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)
N. & G. Taylor Co. v. Anderson
14 F.2d 353 (Seventh Circuit, 1926)
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Kinney
260 U.S. 340 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Pope v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.
207 S.W. 514 (Texas Supreme Court, 1918)