St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sanders
40 Kan. 469
Opinion
Upon the authority of L. T. & S. W. Rly. Co. v. Forbes, 37 Kas. 445, the judgment of the district court will be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
We think it necessary to add that the word “prescribed” should read “proscribed,” in the twenty-fourth line of page 452, 37 Kas. “Proscribed” is the word used in the opinion, and by error was improperly changed in printing to “prescribed.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sanders, 40 Kan. 469 (kan 1888).
40 Kan. 469 (St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leavenworth, Topeka & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Forbes
37 Kan. 445 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1887)