St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bennett

69 F. 530, 16 C.C.A. 680, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2403
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 1895
DocketNo. 582
StatusPublished

This text of 69 F. 530 (St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bennett, 69 F. 530, 16 C.C.A. 680, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2403 (8th Cir. 1895).

Opinion

SANBOBN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by the administratrix of the estate of W. W. Bennett, the defendant in error, to recover damages from the St. Louis & San Francisco Bailway Company and its receivers, the plaintiffs in error, for injuries to the deceased which she alleged were caused by the negligence of the company. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant in error. This case arose from'the same state of facts, and was tried upon the same theory of the law, as the case of Railway Co. v. Bennett (just decided by this court) 69 Fed. 525. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment below must be reversed, and the case remanded, with directions to grant a new trial, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bennett
69 F. 525 (Eighth Circuit, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 F. 530, 16 C.C.A. 680, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-s-f-ry-co-v-bennett-ca8-1895.