St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker

1914 OK 46, 138 P. 144, 41 Okla. 382, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 145

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Okla. 494 →

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 19, 1914·No. 2336·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Since the original opinion was handed down in this cause, the defendant in error has filed with the clerk of this court a remittitur in the sum of $200, as required in the original opinion. Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, it has been determined that the original opinion filed herein should be adhered to, and that the petition for rehearing should be denied, and the judgment appealed from, when credited with the amount of the remittitur, should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Since the original opinion was handed down in this cause, the defendant in error has filed with the clerk of this court a remittitur in the sum of $200, as required in the original opinion. Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, it has been determined that the original opinion filed herein should be adhered to, and that the petition for rehearing should be denied, and the judgment appealed from, when credited with the amount of the remittitur, should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker, 1914 OK 46, 138 P. 144, 41 Okla. 382, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 145 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK 46 (St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.