St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker

1914 OK 46, 138 P. 144, 41 Okla. 382, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 145

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 19, 1914

Docket2336

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK 46 (St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Walker, 1914 OK 46, 138 P. 144, 41 Okla. 382, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 145 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Since the original opinion was handed down in this cause, the defendant in error has filed with the clerk of this court a remittitur in the sum of $200, as required in the original opinion. Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, it has been determined that the original opinion filed herein should be adhered to, and that the petition for rehearing should be denied, and the judgment appealed from, when credited with the amount of the remittitur, should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Since the original opinion was handed down in this cause, the defendant in error has filed with the clerk of this court a remittitur in the sum of $200, as required in the original opinion. Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, it has been determined that the original opinion filed herein should be adhered to, and that the petition for rehearing should be denied, and the judgment appealed from, when credited with the amount of the remittitur, should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK 46, 138 P. 144, 41 Okla. 382, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-s-f-r-co-v-walker-okla-1914.