St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway v. Ingram
244 U.S. 647, 37 S. Ct. 741, 61 L. Ed. 1370, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1684
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway v. Ingram, 244 U.S. 647, 37 S. Ct. 741, 61 L. Ed. 1370, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1684 (1917).
244 U.S. 647 (St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. King
222 U.S. 222 (Supreme Court, 1911)
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Padgett
236 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Whitacre
242 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1916)