St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Intermedics, Inc.

623 F. Supp. 1289
CourtDistrict Court, D. Minnesota
DecidedOctober 10, 1984
DocketCiv. Nos. 4-84-267, 4-84-529 and 4-84-643
StatusPublished

This text of 623 F. Supp. 1289 (St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Intermedics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Intermedics, Inc., 623 F. Supp. 1289 (mnd 1984).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

These companion cases arise from a manufacturing relationship involving St. Jude Medical, Inc. (St. Jude), Intermedies, Inc. (Intermedies), and CarboMedics, Inc. (CarboMedics). In the first of three cases filed, Civil No. 4-84-267, St. Jude alleges breach [1290]*1290of contract, breach of confidential duty, and misappropriation of trade secrets by CarboMedics and Intermedies.1 In Civil No. 4-84-529, CarboMedics alleges that St. Jude breached its fiduciary duty to CarboMedics and confidentiality provisions of a supply contract, that St. Jude misappropriated trade secrets, and that St. Jude and Sorin Biomedica, S.P.A., an Italian corporation which manufactures pyrolytic carbon-coated devices, have conspired wrongfully to exploit these trade secrets at CarboMedics’ expense. CarboMedics also charges in Civil No. 4-84-643 patent infringement by St. Jude and seeks a declaratory judgment that it is not violating a St. Jude patent. St. Jude counterclaimed, alleging invalidity of CarboMedics’ patents infringements. Jurisdiction in each case is founded on diversity of citizenship.

These matters are presently before the court upon St. Jude’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief. St. Jude wants the court to order CarboMedics to manufacture and deliver heart valve components pursuant to a January 1, 1983 supply contract and appointment of a special master to monitor this relationship.

BACKGROUND

The relevant facts appear to be as follows. St. Jude, a Minnesota corporation, is in the business of assembling, testing, and marketing mechanical heart valves of various sizes, technically known as “bi-leaflet pyrolytic carbon coated prosthetic heart valves.” CarboMedics, a Texas corporation, is in the business of selling pyrolytic carbon for medical applications. CarboMedics has processed the pyrolytic carbon for heart valves assembled and marketed by St. Jude since 1977. Intermedies, a Texas corporation, is the parent corporation of CarboMedics.

CarboMedics is the successor in interest to the former Medical Products Division of General Atomic Company, a California corporation, and the assignee or licensee of its intellectual property. The division was acquired by Intermedies, renamed CarboMedics, and became a subsidiary of Intermedies.

With the aid of CarboMedics, St. Jude developed its carbon coated prosthetic heart valve in approximately 1977. St. Jude and CarboMedics worked together to develop the necessary manufacturing process. St. Jude has sold its valve in international markets since 1978. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved St. Jude’s valve for general marketing throughout the United States on December 17, 1982. St. Jude’s valve is well accepted in the medical community and has attained significant market penetration both in the United States and foreign countries.2

CarboMedics has fabricated components for heart valves marketed by St. Jude pursuant to a series of written supply contracts which began in 1980. CarboMedics is apparently the only manufacturer capable of manufacturing carbon coated mechanical heart valve components. To alleviate its customers’ concerns about their sole reliance on CarboMedics, CarboMedics included in its standard contract form provisions limiting its bargaining power. These provisions appeared in the 1980, 1981, and 1982 supply agreements between CarboMedics and St. Jude, and they are critical to the parties’ dispute under the January 1, 1983 supply agreement.3

St. Jude bases its breach of contract claims on paragraphs 10.1, 11.0 and 15.0 of the 1983 supply contract. Paragraph 10.1 governs termination and provides that the “obligation of Manufacturer [CarboMedics] [1291]*1291under this agreement may not be terminated unilaterally” by CarboMedics until such time as CarboMedics has:

1) informed St. Jude of CarboMedic’s intent to terminate:
2) determined from St. Jude an approximation of the length of time St. Jude will require to develop an alternative source; and
3) supplied to St. Jude heart valve components in sufficient quantities to meet St. Jude’s requirements for the time St. Jude estimates will be necessary to develop an alternative source.

Paragraph 11.0 contains limitations on CarboMedics due to its position as sole manufacturer of carbon components,4 and paragraph 15.0 provides that the remedy for breach of the terms of the agreement, including allegations of patent infringement, is to initiate a lawsuit.

St. Jude alleges that CarboMedics breached the 1983 agreement by refusing to deliver approximately 3,900 heart valve sets promised to be delivered in 1983. In addition, St. Jude maintains that CarboMedics has a duty, pursuant to Paragraph 10.1, to supply components to St. Jude until St. Jude can find an alternative source. St. Jude contends that the intention of the parties to preserve the supply of components until any disputes could be resolved is further illustrated by paragraph 15.0.5

By contrast, CarboMedics alleges that the provisions of the 1983 supply agreement are not enforceable. CarboMedics contends that St. Jude fraudulently induced CarboMedics to enter into that agreement by deliberately concealing a plan to produce its own carbon coated heart valve components. And even if the provisions were enforceable, CarboMedics asserts that it has fully complied with the terms of the agreement by performance of a May 1984 interim supply agreement. It also points to St. Jude’s public assertion that it has enough components to last until an alternative source would be available. Finally, CarboMedics maintains that it was justified in terminating the 1983 agreement because St. Jude had breached the contract by misappropriating CarboMedics’s trade secrets. CarboMedics states that it demanded assurances of due performance of the confidentiality portions of the contract under Minn. Stat. § 336.2-609 and was therefore free to terminate under Minn.Stat. § 336.2-609(4) when St. Jude did not comply.

St. Jude brought an action for similar injunctive relief in March 1984, but withdrew its motion at that time because the parties signed an interim supply agreement on May 2, 1984. Pursuant to this agreement, CarboMedics agreed to supply St. Jude with 5,307 heart component sets.6

[1292]*1292St. Jude contacted CarboMedics requesting discussions to negotiate a further interim supply agreement, but CarboMedics rejected that proposal. St. Jude then brought this motion for injunctive relief. DISCUSSION

Whether preliminary injunctive relief should be granted depends upon the showing made on the following factors: (1) the threat of irreparable harm to the movant; (2) the state of the balance between this harm and the injury that granting the injunction will inflict on other parties litigant; (3) the probability that the movant will succeed on the merits; and (4) the public interest. Dataphase Systems v. C L Systems, Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir.1981).

The affidavits submitted by St. Jude indicate that the continued supply of carbon coated heart valve components is essential to the operation of its business.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.
640 F.2d 109 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
Edelen v. Samuels & Co.
103 S.W. 360 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 F. Supp. 1289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-jude-medical-inc-v-intermedics-inc-mnd-1984.