(SS) Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 12, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-00214·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | MARIA JUANITA PEREZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00214-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR 13 v. DISMISSAL 14 | ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, (ECF No. 17) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Maria Juanita Perez and Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social 19 | Security, have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 24.) In 20 | light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 | 41(€a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the 92 | Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 23 IS SO ORDERED. 24 25| Dated: _ November 12, 2020 [sf ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(SS) Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)