(SS) Leighty v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE, WSBN 32245 Associate General Counsel Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 Social Security Administration JENNIFER C. FORSYTH, CO #33659 Special Assistant United States Attorney 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21235 Telephone: 303-844-7368 E-Mail: Jennifer.Forsyth@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant ) Case No.: 2:22-cv-01598-JDP ) STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND Plaintiff, ) PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND ) EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL vs. ) ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. ) § 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of ) U.S.C. § 1920; [PROPOSED] ORDER Social Security, ) ) ) Defendant. ) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $11,500.00 (ELEVEN THOUSAND FIVE-HUNDRED dollars and ZERO cents) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of $402.00 (FOUR HUNDRED AND TWO dollars and ZERO cents) to be paid separately from the Judgment Fund, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel, if any. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor any assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to counsel. Payments may be made by electronic fund transfer (EFT) or by check. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or counsel including counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees or costs in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of counsel and/or counsel’s firm to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. Respectfully submitted, Date: May 20, 2024 /s/ David Linden* DAVID LINDEN (as authorized by email on May 17, 2024) Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: May 20, 2024 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel Social Security Administration
/s/ Jennifer C. Forsyth Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Attorney for Defendant
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $11,500.00 (ELEVEN THOUSAND FIVE-HUNDRED dollars and ZERO cents) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of $402.00 (FOUR HUNDRED AND TWO dollars and ZERO cents) to be paid separately from the Judgment Fund, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. Payments may be made by electronic fund transfer (EFT) or by check. ( _ Dated: _ May 29, 2024 Q——— JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
EAJA Stip.; No. 2:22-cv-01598-JDP
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(SS) Leighty v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Leighty v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.