(SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 2, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-00054·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | RICHARD KEVIN LEE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00054-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 V. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 14 | ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, (ECF No. 24) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, Richard Lee, and Defendant, Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, 19 | have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action (ECF No. 24). In light of the stipulation, the 20 | case has ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. 91 | City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is 22 | respectfully directed to close this case. IS SO ORDERED. 23 24| Dated: _ November 2, 2020 [Orr Fahey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)