(SS) Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security

E.D. California

(SS) Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedJune 29, 2022

Docket1:21-cv-00340

StatusUnknown

This text of (SS) Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(SS) Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 MINA HOWARD, CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-00340-GSA

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 9 v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF 10 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting Commissioner of Social Security, 11 12 Defendant. 13

14 The parties stipulate to a 30-day extension of time from July 7, 2022 to August 8, 2022 for 15 Defendant to file a response brief due to counsel’s workload. This is Defendant’s first extension. 16 When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider 17 the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in seeking 18 the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant 19 Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV- 20 01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2020). The Court has the inherent 21 power to manage its own docket to achieve an orderly and expeditious resolution of cases. Southern 22 California Edison Co. v. Lynch, 307 F.3d 794 (9th Cir. 2002). 23 Counsel identified good cause for the extension. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 24 Defendant’s deadline to file a response brief is extended to and including August 8, 2022. All other 25 deadlines are adjusted accordingly. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: June 28, 2022 /s/ Gary S. Austin 28 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 MINA HOWARD, CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-00340-GSA

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 9 v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF 10 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting Commissioner of Social Security, 11 12 Defendant. 13

14 The parties stipulate to a 30-day extension of time from July 7, 2022 to August 8, 2022 for 15 Defendant to file a response brief due to counsel’s workload. This is Defendant’s first extension. 16 When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider 17 the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in seeking 18 the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant 19 Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV- 20 01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2020). The Court has the inherent 21 power to manage its own docket to achieve an orderly and expeditious resolution of cases. Southern 22 California Edison Co. v. Lynch, 307 F.3d 794 (9th Cir. 2002). 23 Counsel identified good cause for the extension. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 24 Defendant’s deadline to file a response brief is extended to and including August 8, 2022. All other 25 deadlines are adjusted accordingly. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: June 28, 2022 /s/ Gary S. Austin 28 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(SS) Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ss-howard-v-commissioner-of-social-security-caed-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack