(SS) Avery v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 9, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-00470·Unknown

Opinion

HADLEY & FRAULOB A Professional Law Corporation 230 Fifth Street Marysville, CA 95901 (916) 743-4458 FAX (530) 743-5008

JOSEPH C. FRAULOB – CA State Bar #194355 Attorney For Plaintiff No. 2:19-cv-00470-DB Plaintiff,

vs. AWARD OF EAJA FEES

Defendant IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court as provided below, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access To Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by his counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order to EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine if it is subject to any offset. Fees and costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees and costs to be made directly to Plaintiff’s counsel Joseph C. Fraulob, pursuant to the written assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel Joseph C. Fraulob. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

DATE: December 6, 2020 By /s/ Joseph Clayton Fraulob Attorney for plaintiff

DATE: December 6, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By /s/ Michael Marriott (*authorized via e-mail on December 6, 2020) Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 8, 2020 /S/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Avery v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(SS) Avery v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Avery v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)