S.R. ex rel. S.H.R. v. K.M.

463 S.W.3d 468
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2015·No. No. ED 102451·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

K.M. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment Reviving Judgments entered December 19, 2014. We have reviewed Appellant’s brief1 and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.R. ex rel. S.H.R. v. K.M., 463 S.W.3d 468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

463 S.W.3d 468 (S.R. ex rel. S.H.R. v. K.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)