S.R. ex rel. S.H.R. v. K.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

S.R. ex rel. S.H.R. v. K.M.

463 S.W.3d 468

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 9, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102451

StatusPublished

This text of 463 S.W.3d 468 (S.R. ex rel. S.H.R. v. K.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.R. ex rel. S.H.R. v. K.M., 463 S.W.3d 468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

K.M. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment Reviving Judgments entered December 19, 2014. We have reviewed Appellant’s brief¹ and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

K.M. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment Reviving Judgments entered December 19, 2014. We have reviewed Appellant’s brief¹ and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 S.W.3d 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sr-ex-rel-shr-v-km-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack