Squires v. Bonser
Opinion
Opinions of the United
1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
6-22-1995
Squires v Bonser Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Docket 94-7035
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995
Recommended Citation "Squires v Bonser" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 123. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/123
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
_ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 94-7035 _______________
JOSEPH SQUIRES, SR. Appellant
V.
THOMAS BONSER; JAY E. HUFFMAN; MIDDLE SMITHFIELD TOWNSHIP Appellees _______________
Before: BECKER and COWEN, Circuit Judges and POLLAK, District Judge*
ORDER _______________
The petition for panel rehearing is granted and the
opinion filed on May 8, 1995, is amended by adding a footnote 17
at the final word of the opinion's text ("damages"), such
footnote to be as follows:
17. At the new trial the jury is to be instructed that its award of compensatory damages cannot exceed $37,100.
By the Court,
\s\ Louis H. Pollak District Judge
Dated: June 22, 1995
*Honorable Louis H. Pollak, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Penndylvania, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Squires v. Bonser (Squires v. Bonser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.