Sprueill v. Hamlet

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Sprueill v. Hamlet

133 S.E.2d 173, 260 N.C. 546, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 755

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 20, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 S.E.2d 173 (Sprueill v. Hamlet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sprueill v. Hamlet, 133 S.E.2d 173, 260 N.C. 546, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 755 (N.C. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR Cuhiam.

We have carefully examined the evidence. We are of ■the opinion and hold that, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it is sufficient to permit a jury to find the facts to be a® alleged by plaintiff. If the facts be a® plaintiff alleges, defendant is liable. No useful purpose would be served by detailed analysis of the evidence. In accord with our practice, Weaver v. Bennett, 259 N.C. 16, 129 S.E. 2d 610, discussion of the evidence is omitted.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR Cuhiam.

We have carefully examined the evidence. We are of ■the opinion and hold that, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it is sufficient to permit a jury to find the facts to be a® alleged by plaintiff. If the facts be a® plaintiff alleges, defendant is liable. No useful purpose would be served by detailed analysis of the evidence. In accord with our practice, Weaver v. Bennett, 259 N.C. 16, 129 S.E. 2d 610, discussion of the evidence is omitted.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.E.2d 173, 260 N.C. 546, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprueill-v-hamlet-nc-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack